<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Tests New &#8220;Social Voting&#8221; Rank Algo &#8211; Similar to Digg.com&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thelazymarketer.com/blog/2008/07/16/google-tests-new-social-voting-rank-algo-similar-to-diggcom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thelazymarketer.com/blog/2008/07/16/google-tests-new-social-voting-rank-algo-similar-to-diggcom/</link>
	<description>Super-Affiliates Work Smarter - Not Necessarily Harder...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:08:40 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally Neill</title>
		<link>http://www.thelazymarketer.com/blog/2008/07/16/google-tests-new-social-voting-rank-algo-similar-to-diggcom/#comment-849</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally Neill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 16:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelazymarketer.com/blog/2008/07/16/google-tests-new-social-voting-rank-algo-similar-to-diggcom/#comment-849</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris

That was a really interesting post and I for one would not be afraid should this take effect.

Sally :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris</p>
<p>That was a really interesting post and I for one would not be afraid should this take effect.</p>
<p>Sally <img src='http://www.thelazymarketer.com/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angela</title>
		<link>http://www.thelazymarketer.com/blog/2008/07/16/google-tests-new-social-voting-rank-algo-similar-to-diggcom/#comment-848</link>
		<dc:creator>Angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 08:32:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelazymarketer.com/blog/2008/07/16/google-tests-new-social-voting-rank-algo-similar-to-diggcom/#comment-848</guid>
		<description>Hi Chris,
I&#039;m wondering if you are still using the software submission approach? Do you still recommend using Promosoft?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Chris,<br />
I&#8217;m wondering if you are still using the software submission approach? Do you still recommend using Promosoft?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Gates</title>
		<link>http://www.thelazymarketer.com/blog/2008/07/16/google-tests-new-social-voting-rank-algo-similar-to-diggcom/#comment-847</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Gates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 15:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelazymarketer.com/blog/2008/07/16/google-tests-new-social-voting-rank-algo-similar-to-diggcom/#comment-847</guid>
		<description>Chris,
Gone are the days of mass creating web pages to earn income via Adsense, or other affiliate programs.

Content has always been king, and the mass built sites are dying a slow death - as they should.

If you just build good quality content sites, with the user experience in mind, you should not have any problems as Google makes changes.

Love you reports!

Mike</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris,<br />
Gone are the days of mass creating web pages to earn income via Adsense, or other affiliate programs.</p>
<p>Content has always been king, and the mass built sites are dying a slow death &#8211; as they should.</p>
<p>If you just build good quality content sites, with the user experience in mind, you should not have any problems as Google makes changes.</p>
<p>Love you reports!</p>
<p>Mike</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Internet Marketing Badger - Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://www.thelazymarketer.com/blog/2008/07/16/google-tests-new-social-voting-rank-algo-similar-to-diggcom/#comment-846</link>
		<dc:creator>Internet Marketing Badger - Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 19:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelazymarketer.com/blog/2008/07/16/google-tests-new-social-voting-rank-algo-similar-to-diggcom/#comment-846</guid>
		<description>Yeah, to win popularity, you still have to do it the old-fashioned way - with one satisfied visitor at a time. Google&#039;s changing algs. just serve as another reminder that quality is important, no matter how much we like to dream and drool about automated web creation robots earning us multi-millions....it&#039;s just not gonna happen. You have to find a way to make your sites personal and have them stand out. The human touch is important. That&#039;s what wins votes.

By the way, Chris - I&#039;m loving your Conduit Method and Reverse Niche Selection reports - they totally rock!  Built my first conduit site in a really dumb niche, actually, and still managed to make money in a couple of days from it. I&#039;m psyched about the potentials here.

Thanks!
Jennifer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, to win popularity, you still have to do it the old-fashioned way &#8211; with one satisfied visitor at a time. Google&#8217;s changing algs. just serve as another reminder that quality is important, no matter how much we like to dream and drool about automated web creation robots earning us multi-millions&#8230;.it&#8217;s just not gonna happen. You have to find a way to make your sites personal and have them stand out. The human touch is important. That&#8217;s what wins votes.</p>
<p>By the way, Chris &#8211; I&#8217;m loving your Conduit Method and Reverse Niche Selection reports &#8211; they totally rock!  Built my first conduit site in a really dumb niche, actually, and still managed to make money in a couple of days from it. I&#8217;m psyched about the potentials here.</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Jennifer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheow</title>
		<link>http://www.thelazymarketer.com/blog/2008/07/16/google-tests-new-social-voting-rank-algo-similar-to-diggcom/#comment-845</link>
		<dc:creator>Cheow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 10:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelazymarketer.com/blog/2008/07/16/google-tests-new-social-voting-rank-algo-similar-to-diggcom/#comment-845</guid>
		<description>Wow, that is a nice piece of information by you Chris... And you are right - If we are doing our work and creating mini-sites with unique content, we should not be worrying too much about this.

In the search business, at the end of the day, it is all about relevancy. As long as our content is unique and useful to readers, long-tailed SEO will take effect and targeted traffic will come.

Cheow

P.S: I love your &quot;Confessions&quot;! Working on my first mini-site now!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that is a nice piece of information by you Chris&#8230; And you are right &#8211; If we are doing our work and creating mini-sites with unique content, we should not be worrying too much about this.</p>
<p>In the search business, at the end of the day, it is all about relevancy. As long as our content is unique and useful to readers, long-tailed SEO will take effect and targeted traffic will come.</p>
<p>Cheow</p>
<p>P.S: I love your &#8220;Confessions&#8221;! Working on my first mini-site now!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles</title>
		<link>http://www.thelazymarketer.com/blog/2008/07/16/google-tests-new-social-voting-rank-algo-similar-to-diggcom/#comment-844</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:20:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thelazymarketer.com/blog/2008/07/16/google-tests-new-social-voting-rank-algo-similar-to-diggcom/#comment-844</guid>
		<description>Good points. If google does eventually bring this in, I seriously doubt it would be anything to worry about unless you are doing purely blackhat SEO, delivering no value whatsoever.

If you have even half decent sites then social voting will actually BENEFIT you since the vast majority of sites are complete junk anyway. An affiliate pitch site with a few basic articles and product reviews is already way better than most stuff out there indexed by google. 

How well you rank in google is totally relative. You don&#039;t need to have an amazing/unique value. You just need to be better than the competition...And it&#039;s not particularly hard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points. If google does eventually bring this in, I seriously doubt it would be anything to worry about unless you are doing purely blackhat SEO, delivering no value whatsoever.</p>
<p>If you have even half decent sites then social voting will actually BENEFIT you since the vast majority of sites are complete junk anyway. An affiliate pitch site with a few basic articles and product reviews is already way better than most stuff out there indexed by google. </p>
<p>How well you rank in google is totally relative. You don&#8217;t need to have an amazing/unique value. You just need to be better than the competition&#8230;And it&#8217;s not particularly hard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
