Hey guys,
I’ve got something very cool that’s being released in a few days…
It’s a software program developed by Dave Kelly (from Linkvana) that performs a “white hat exploit” to legitimately place your backlink on major authority sites that use a popular, widely-used widget.
In fact, this widget normally appears on the home page, which means that it’s very easy to get PR5+ backlinks with virtually no “effort” whatsoever.
You simply load up the software program – which is called Authority Loophole – and then run a simple search for your base keywords, and it pulls up every site that uses the “exploitable” widget. And there are thousands upon thousands of very established authority sites that use it.
The process of placing your link can take anywhere from 1 to 10 minutes on each site, but usually on the lower end of that.
Conservatively speaking, your links will last anywhere from 1 week to 1 year. It all depends on the nature of the site, and how they’re using the widget. Regardless, the amount of spidering activity and initial rankings can catapult any site very quickly.
But the bottom line is that this is the easiest, fastest and most certainly the “cheapest” (as in: free) way to get authoritative backlinks that currently exists.
Authority Loophole will be available in a few days time.
This will be very effective for getting indexed – and ranked (quickly) – in all 3 major search engines, but most particularly, Google.
That’s because these kinds of links are NOT seen by spiders as easy to get. Google does NOT consider this to be a “freebie” link, such as with article submission, directory subs, etc.
These links will carry the weight of an authority site linking to YOUR site directly from a strong page, sitewide or (usually) the home page.
Sound cool?
Let me know…
And stay tuned.
Cheers,
-Chris
188 responses so far ↓
1 Vinnie // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:32 pm
Chris, looking forward to it.
2 SEO Services // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:33 pm
Ok, I’m waiting with baited breath to find out. Please keep me updated.
3 Anthony // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:34 pm
Cool is right man! Let me at ‘er
4 Mikael // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:35 pm
Can’t wait Chriss.
BTW congrats on the latest 24hour product update. It is a huge eyeopener.
Thanks,
Mikael
5 Tom // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:35 pm
Sounds like a software tool to find “Top Commenter” blogs.
I do this via Google Blog Search.
6 Charles // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:35 pm
Tell me more Tell me more
7 Kevin Baker // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:36 pm
Sounds interesting. As a blogger myself page rank is what makes a site have value and visitors. Anything that speeds up the ranking possibilities is game for me to look at.
Nice one Chris.
8 Feminine Tattoos // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:37 pm
Now THIS sounds pretty cool.
Thanks Chris, can’t wait to see what it’s all about.
9 Mike // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:38 pm
Can’t wait…but I guess I’;ll have to!
10 Greg // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:39 pm
This is why I follow Chris Rempel…thanks for the heads up!
11 Don // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:41 pm
WOW, sounds great. Waiting…
12 Claude // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:41 pm
Very interesting!
13 Drew Jones // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:41 pm
Great idea…I will have to get with you about a few ideas on SEO.
14 Brian Kopp // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:42 pm
Does it work with only WordPress or it can also work with Blogger, Squidoo, Hubpages and other static website created by other programs?
Please share more on this…
15 Dave // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:43 pm
Chris, If this is half as good as you say it is break out the link juice and lets party!
16 Tony // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:44 pm
I’m interested but cautious…After spending 6 months + with a MSN loophole 10 blog on 10 different c-class set-up with caffeinated content and linkumate etc, and then Dave’s personal linkumate from date of launch until a week ago. I never had a single front page ranking on what I would consider pretty mundaine topics for my money site. I like Chris, and feel like he gives good information, but a blind follower I am no more…
17 Paul // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:44 pm
Man, I’m drooling like a dog at a meat market!
18 Jeff Bode // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:45 pm
Hey Chris this sounds like a cool software… any type of automation is always useful – we all value our time (or should at least)!
As always, I expect this to be another great product from you!
19 Tim // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:45 pm
It does sound cool, can’t wait to hear more.
20 Barry Walls // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:45 pm
Sounds great Chris…cant wait!
21 Greg // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:46 pm
Looks like something I’d like to try. Hope to see it soon!
22 Nick // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:46 pm
This gonna work on a Mac?
23 Joseph Murray // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:49 pm
I can’t wait Chris!
24 admin // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:49 pm
@Nick – good question.
I will check with Dave. It’s an EXE file so, to lean on the safeside, for now I would say “no”, but let me make sure before giving a definite answer.
Thanks
-Chris
25 Linda // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:50 pm
Chris, looking forward to it.
Linda
26 Games Galore // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:51 pm
This software sounds great I’m sold, but can you be penalized by using this software?
Thanks for reply in advance…
27 Ed - Makeup Foundation // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:53 pm
chris,
if these are temporary links, won’t we get slammed by google when we start losing the links?
i had a site where i lost a lot of links (even though i still had a lot) and immediately lost a lot of page rank and rankings.
i thought google does not like to see a site lose a lot of links since it raises a red flag to them that they were probably unnatural or manufactured links.
i started staying away from “renting links” programs like 3waylinks, etc. since if you ever want to stop the subscription, you lose your links…and then pr and rankings.
is this not true?
28 admin // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:53 pm
@Games – No, if you use it properly and according to our best-practices guide, you won’t.
Also, the software operation itself comes with built-in proxy rotation, so that even your usage of the program does not invoke any kind of “red flag”, or IP blocking.
Cheers
-Chris
29 Dave // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:56 pm
Sounds way to good to be true.
Even if it works this could at the detriment of a site over time and cause more harm than good.
This would need to be tested on rather insignificant sites before utilizing it on major sites.
May be worth testing.
30 admin // Jun 24, 2009 at 4:57 pm
Hi Ed, re: dropping links
No, Google does not “penalize” you for links being dropped. That’s a natural part of the web in general.
Sites change, links get moved around, dropped, etc.
The reason why your rankings would have dropped is because when the index was updated, those links (which would have been providing your “rank power”) could no longer be found, and so therefore your site lost some link juice.
It’s not a matter of being penalized.
When you’re penalized, it’s because the links you DID build and DO exist have been discounted.
Also, this method should be one of the various strategies you employ – not the ONLY link building method by any means.
The fact remains that some links will remain for several months, and others indefinitely.
Only good can result if you’re doing this correctly.
-Chris
31 Buziness.fr // Jun 24, 2009 at 5:00 pm
if you find an exploit and such a valuable software, why do you relieve it to all public ?
Why don’t privilegiate customers FIRST !
I am with you since the very first version of Conduit and i think you can privilegiate old followers…no ?
32 jack // Jun 24, 2009 at 5:01 pm
No fair talking about it and we can’t get it yet!
33 Making money online // Jun 24, 2009 at 5:01 pm
I would like to find out more first, but if it works the way you say then definitely sign me up…
34 Jim // Jun 24, 2009 at 5:02 pm
This software sounds great, but can I am a bit apprehensive about being penalized. But, if it is coming from the Linkvana developer it must be pretty good.
35 Adrian // Jun 24, 2009 at 5:04 pm
I’ve been using Linkvana for almost 2 months and I’m only showing 1 backlink thus far (from yahoo – Google never shows the numbers)… so I sure hope it improves soon because this product reflects Link Vana in a way…
36 Musica en Linea // Jun 24, 2009 at 5:12 pm
All are Do Follow?
37 Lidia Abadia // Jun 24, 2009 at 5:14 pm
Hi Chris, thanks for keeping us abreast of the new great traffic strategies. I look forward to your release!
38 Martijn // Jun 24, 2009 at 5:15 pm
Sounds brilliant.. Anyone can use more PR links.
It’s easy enough to create loads of backlinks with no PR, but to get some PR ones is the hardest (and most effective if you succeed)
Count me in.
39 Kathy // Jun 24, 2009 at 5:16 pm
I agree about the MSN ‘Loophole’. I think that Chris lost much credibility with the product. Will certainly wait a while before I purchase anything else.
40 admin // Jun 24, 2009 at 5:17 pm
@Adrian – Linkvana works very well. With any link-building campaign, it takes time for links to “show” and for the results to take effect.
It also depends on how many links you’ve been building.
@Musica – The software clearly identifies dofollow sites.
41 Leo S. // Jun 24, 2009 at 5:19 pm
Very interesting, indeed.
Sounds like a really new concept…
42 max // Jun 24, 2009 at 5:20 pm
sounds really good, waiting to hear more… am “suspicious” of most claims..
43 Shelby // Jun 24, 2009 at 5:20 pm
I’m in.
44 Drinking Wine All Day // Jun 24, 2009 at 5:23 pm
Good – Looking forward to it! Knew those silly widget thingies had to be good for something other than taking up space and wasting time.
45 Steve // Jun 24, 2009 at 5:24 pm
Ultra cool. Looking forward to using it.
46 Oaks // Jun 24, 2009 at 5:26 pm
Tony,
I did the MSN Loophole thing with Caffienated Content and Linkubaitor with no results after 7 months. I had 35 blogs and 40 money sites. Personally, I don’t think I did a good enough job with the money sites. However, what I did end up with was 75 PR2 domains so it looks like Google has been passing around some page rank to these new domains during this period.
7 month old PR2 domains should be worth a few bucks a day each in Adsense income if only I had the time to change them to decent blogs.
Maybe you should check your domains to see if you’ve earned some PR
47 John // Jun 24, 2009 at 5:28 pm
Ready and waitin Chris!
48 admin // Jun 24, 2009 at 5:34 pm
@Kathy and Tom – MSN Loophole works, plain and simple. Just like how article marketing works.
But effective keyword research is paramount, followed by investing time into creating an AUTHORITATIVE blog network. If you do not have those things nailed down, then you’re not really using the strategy.
Dave has added an extensive amount of followup material to the course to clarify these technical issues, as well as show examples of site after site that ranks well using the loophole strategy.
It’s undeniable – it works when you work the system. And what the system needs is a blog network that is well indexed, and money-sites that are well-targeted with profitable, attainable keywords.
Over the past several months, almost exclusively, of everyone that has complained that the strategy did not work for them, this was why:
1. They only had a small handful of blogs – usually on the same C Class – and none of them were well spidered by MSN. MSN could only see a few pages “deep” into the blogs, which totally nullifies the effect of the sitewide link rotation.
2. The money-sites they were building were almost ALL exclusively targeting keywords like “make money online” or “work from home”.
Even using the loophole, going after keywords with an absolutely crazy amount of competition – even among the loophole clientele – just isn’t going to work out.
Yes, the ‘loophole DOES work to rank for very competitive stuff in Bing, but not when every other loopholer is gunning for the exact same target.
And finally…
3. They didn’t wait long enough.
In most cases, the people that actually stick through with the strategy and WORK to get their blog network established and indexed would only see rankings after about a month, and sometimes longer.
In fact, we started to see sites that actually DID end up ranking for keywords like “make money online”, but when clicked, it would land on an expired page.
They had thrown in the towel before their sites even had a chance to rank.
Regardless of what people think or say, our test results and the results of everyone who built up their network properly speak for themselves.
Just like in regular SEO, it’s not a matter of “if”, but “how”.
And lots of people don’t have the patience, the dedication or the perseverance to follow through with the “how”.
That said, I do think that Loophole was perhaps a bit of a misfire since it became so popular.
We never anticipated such a widespread exposure, and therefore userbase.
The result is that inevitably, the newbies struggled due to a lack of overall knowledge, while anyone with previous SEO experience cleaned up.
This is simply the way it goes.
For further details on what to believe regarding all of this, go to:
http://www.thelazymarketer.com/blog/2009/05/14/hype-vs-reality-be-very-careful-what-you-believe/
49 Chad // Jun 24, 2009 at 5:38 pm
Chris, as a newbie in all this, this look very valuable. Been building links with some free tools, but you’re right it takes a while, and more automated tools in the Link Campaign toolbox is always better.
50 Casey // Jun 24, 2009 at 5:46 pm
I find this difficult to believe. Usually the only way to get page rank is hard work and good content.
So you are telling me a bunch of crappy sites are going to get a good page rank because of this.
If that is the case this is not good because I want to get rid of the crappy sites on the internet not build them up.
51 Games Galore // Jun 24, 2009 at 5:49 pm
Thanks for the reply, its good to know we wont be penalized if used correctly ….
I guess my next worry would be, roughly how much will this software cost. Some of us work with a poor mans budget
52 Aaron // Jun 24, 2009 at 5:50 pm
Cool idea, this software sounds like something that could work.
My only concern is — whatever this ‘widget’ is, if a thousand people start adding spammy links to it on every site that hosts it, are the developers going to change the widget so that this no longer works?
If we can be sure that won’t happen, and the price is right, I’m in
53 admin // Jun 24, 2009 at 5:59 pm
@Casey,
This exploit is one that will really only work if the destination site is useful, and if the “exploit” is done in a way that actually adds value to the “host” site.
Spammers and otherwise dumbass link-builders will find this strategy ineffective because the site owners will simply remove the link – unless, again, our instructions are followed.
This software is an “exploit” but it’s more about using technology in an advantageous way.
Chris
54 Adrian // Jun 24, 2009 at 6:02 pm
Hey Chris,
Yes I know – I have many seo campaigns and sites that rank well. I use a couple other networks as well, I won’t name them here so as to take away from what you are doing. I’m sure you know of them though. It has just been my own personal experience that the links (some at least.. seo is a long process) show up in the !Y Links search a bit sooner than 2 months.
I have also been following the loophole method and even though I did achieve a great ranking, it dropped off months ago and I have yet to see it come back. I’m going to give it until december as it is costing me $550 a month plus another $300 or so for some blog networks.
55 JeffN // Jun 24, 2009 at 6:03 pm
I have put up 20 blog sites the last 6 months. One is PR2 and 9 are PR1. If this will boost them all I’m in.
56 3dogs // Jun 24, 2009 at 6:03 pm
Hope it doesn’t hit the pocketbook too hard. Hard
57 Clarke // Jun 24, 2009 at 6:03 pm
I can’t wait for that software to come out. Sounds very effective and powerful!
58 Patrick // Jun 24, 2009 at 6:05 pm
Hi, this is my first ever blog post and I have a question.
I bought Chris’s book, essentials kit ect.. Seems like one of the ‘very’ few out there really telling it like it is and so for that I applaud him raucously.
My question (and no, it does not take me an hour and a half to watch 60 minutes) is;
I check my competition by Googleing the amount of links they have back linking to their site, lets say it shows they have 6.
I use 2 different free browser based link checker programs and they can say the site has links to it in the thousands!
What Gives????
Is it that when I Google for results I’m only getting the results Google recognizes? And the rest are Yahoo, MSN ect..
Then, if that be correct to concentrate on Google rankings do I only concern myself with the information returned only by Google?
Sorry for the length of the Q, but as you can tell it’s been bugging me. And like the 40 year old Virgin (movie Ref) I had a lot of build up for my 1st time.
Patrick
59 G.from Wealthy Affiliate Review // Jun 24, 2009 at 6:06 pm
Chris
sounds good
Maybe too good ?
I’ve experienced a risk using link building over posting at high PR site, called “link spamming” (I guess) so I do this VERY slowly and with relevant content.
My Q. to this is. What’s happen if more people target the same keyword/sites ??
Will this not look a little bit too obvious to Google that there is a loophole – and close it ?
Just my thoughts
G.
60 Adrian // Jun 24, 2009 at 6:07 pm
I should note that I have over 80 unique c-class IPs and blog networks with Linkubaitor in action as well for the loophole strategy… it’s a shame too.. that one site brought in some good moolah..
61 admin // Jun 24, 2009 at 6:12 pm
Adrian
Your blogs need to be deep-indexed.
More than just the typical RSS submissions.
Perhaps they are, but that’s the primary reason for the strategy not taking effect.
-Chris
62 Adrian // Jun 24, 2009 at 6:13 pm
Again.. whew keep forgetting =)… this may come at a good time when I’m looking for extra link juice…I have about 2,500 links now but am needing those quality PR ones to push the ranking to the top.
I was talking with dave about a possible JV too… feel free to PM Chris in case you want to take a look.
All The Best,
63 Adrian // Jun 24, 2009 at 6:14 pm
Ah hm…. what do you recommend Chris? Change up the footer linkubator code for each blog and have it link to a deep page? Or perhaps the site feed..?
64 Adrian // Jun 24, 2009 at 6:15 pm
Ahck! Again.. Chris it should be noted that my “money” site linkubator code is ONLY displayed on the homepages of my blogs.
Should I have the link rotation on every page? I’m using the standard wordpress theme, (blue header), so that’s the reason why.
Take Care,
65 admin // Jun 24, 2009 at 6:24 pm
Yes – every page.
That must be why…
Thanks Adrian
You can email me at chris@chrisrempel.com if you have a PM…
Cheers
-Chris
66 outsourcing secrets // Jun 24, 2009 at 6:33 pm
Sounds Cool, this will cut the time down time looking for these sites by miles!!!
67 fatimah // Jun 24, 2009 at 6:34 pm
Sounds like a great piece of software that will cut down my work on linking.
Great! looking for to it
68 Joe Whyte // Jun 24, 2009 at 6:44 pm
white hat HACK??? White hat Exploit???
those words are not synonymous with legitimate and white hat!!!
hahaha.. the program is even called authority “loophole”….
lol
Looking forward to testing this out…
69 Richard // Jun 24, 2009 at 6:45 pm
Maybe I’m missing something, but I thought Chris said that this widget was free. When I went to Linkvana’s site, it said:
“Standard price is $197 a month… but if you understand how valuable LinkVana is to your business, and you act now, you can secure your membership for a low monthly price of $147.”
Richard
70 California Commercial Lenders // Jun 24, 2009 at 6:49 pm
I am very wary of too good to be true techniques. In my opinion it seems that good link building takes time like anything else.
I guess we will see!
71 Rod Alfred // Jun 24, 2009 at 6:52 pm
Sounds like what we need to get some good links.
Regards
Rod
72 Adrian // Jun 24, 2009 at 6:56 pm
Sounds good. Will email later on. Just one last word for now on the msn loop if you don’t mind..
1) The link script on every page counts well even though it is on the same c-class?
2) What theme do you recommend? Or does it not matter obviously, as long as there is a column for the script on the individual post pages as well. I’ll have to try and find a free one.
73 admin // Jun 24, 2009 at 7:00 pm
@Richard – the link to Linkvana on the post is simply for reference.
Dave Kelly is the guy behind LinkVana, an established linking service.
More recently, he developed this upcoming software, which DOES tap into a free method of easily obtaining authoritative links.
Thanks
-Chris
74 admin // Jun 24, 2009 at 7:02 pm
@Adrian re: comment #72:
1. Yes. The sitewide linking effect on your sites, across various C Classes creates a swarm of “new” links with each update. This is why you need the script on every PAGE, not just site.
2. Doesn’t matter so long as the script is accomodated and the content is relatively simple.
Cheers
-Chris
75 Dexx // Jun 24, 2009 at 7:03 pm
Hey Chris, glad to see another product by the ol Dave/Chris Team.
Couple Qs for ya before I start jumping for joy:
1) Since this software takes advantage of an “exploit” in a widget…whats to stop the widget from having the exploit fixed when a bunch of blackhatters start spamming the sites?
2) Re: Q1 will there be a limit to the amount of users that can access this software, or will it be a free for all?
3) Are there plans to show a documented case-study etc. of the results of the software and timeframe it took to accomplish those results?
Thanks C!
76 Dax // Jun 24, 2009 at 7:05 pm
I can’t wait…
77 Keith // Jun 24, 2009 at 7:25 pm
I hope this works and is affordable as my Loophole sites still haven’t made a bean after 6 months
78 Jim James // Jun 24, 2009 at 7:30 pm
Looking forward to more good stuff from my favorite IM technician.
Will this show up on the VIP page (those of us who signed up to get everything written by Chris Rempel)?
Best wishes,
Jim J.
79 Get Rid of Warts // Jun 24, 2009 at 7:50 pm
Hi Chris,
This sounds like your new software has a lot of potential. However, there could also be some serious drawbacks, like the site owners being bombarded with a whole lot of links suddenly and closing them down – effectively making the software almost useless.
I say ‘almost’ because experience has taught that not every site will pick up on these things, and act upon them, and many may never pick up on it.
I believe the secret may be to seriously limit the number of people using the software concurrently and hopefully only serious people who have quality sites will use it and follow your method. I think the major factor here will be in the quality of the sites being linked to.
Hopefully, the software won’t be too expensive. I realize that expensive software does automatically limit the number of users, but I cannot afford expensive software right now (and I cannot afford not to have it either
Stay cool,
Barry
80 BigHerba // Jun 24, 2009 at 7:56 pm
Sounds terrific. Will it work for landing pages, or only for blog sites? Looking forward to learning more…and the price.
81 Stainless Steel Cookware Set // Jun 24, 2009 at 7:57 pm
Wow! I can’t wait for this. I’m actually salivating. Where can I get on a waiting list so I don’t miss this Authority Loophole?
82 Sam // Jun 24, 2009 at 8:06 pm
Hey Chris, is this about some xss injection or some chat apps link dropping?
83 Gregg Cleland // Jun 24, 2009 at 8:06 pm
Sounds a little too good to be true, but let’s keep an open mind. :–)
84 Jorge Delgado // Jun 24, 2009 at 8:10 pm
Sounds great Chris!
Best regards,
Jorge
85 Sam // Jun 24, 2009 at 8:13 pm
Ok, since you didn’t approve my comment that means it is about it right
i’ve used that years ago, works well if you know how needs to be done properly.
86 Get Your Ex Back // Jun 24, 2009 at 8:19 pm
Though you have to be careful that you don’t suddenly increase your inbound links that raises alarm bells with Google.
If suddenly you get a heap of inbounds overnight, then obviously Goolge will wonder if it’s natural or artificially created. Just be careful is all I say.
87 chris // Jun 24, 2009 at 8:25 pm
Here, here…sounds great, but price will definately be a problem at this time. Maybe a trial (or better, limited ‘lite’ version for us over-broke newbs
88 Greg Gillespie // Jun 24, 2009 at 8:39 pm
Well Chris,
Another amazing sounding tool for SEO.
I did get incredible results with MSN Loophole, Page 1, Position 2 for highly competitive “best weight loss pills”, yes there you go I mentioned it.
Dumb hey?
Well no, it worked but it took 6 months and every upgrade that Dave through at me and I guess most people won’t buy the lot like I did.
So the new program, will it be all inclusive and work immediately or will there be a delay like MSNLH?
Thanks,
Greg
89 Sports Nutrition Supplements // Jun 24, 2009 at 8:42 pm
Hi Chris,
I have purchased several of your products and they have been of good quality. I didn’t bite on the whole Loophole program as it just sounded too good to be true at least for my main site. This software sounds good as long as the links being built won’t be looked at as spam. That would really throw a stick in the spokes. I’ll keep an open mind and I look forward to reviewing the sales material and software.
Thanks,
Brad
90 Raul // Jun 24, 2009 at 8:43 pm
Looking forward to it, This may be what I need.
Thanks Chris
91 PAUL // Jun 24, 2009 at 8:56 pm
wow! i am so happy about this, yeh! for games
92 Anita // Jun 24, 2009 at 9:15 pm
Thanks Chris,
I ‘ve been following you for sometime now…always enjoyed your materials, very informative. I am certainly looking forward to exploring this tool you mention.
Thanks
Anita
93 How To Make Money Online // Jun 24, 2009 at 9:16 pm
We’ll see! Sounds Great….I’m 0 for 2 on those products.
94 Adrian // Jun 24, 2009 at 9:35 pm
Wrote you a PM Chris – then had to write it again on a support ticket =)
Regards,
95 TJ Short // Jun 24, 2009 at 9:47 pm
Sounds cool am hanging out for it and being a free way to get this type of links it is an extra bonus.
Great stuff as usual
Thanks heaps Chris
96 catch cheating spouse // Jun 24, 2009 at 10:00 pm
Anything that cuts down/out the tedium of building backlinks or having to hire someone who spams your link all over the place, is VERY welcome!
Bring it on Chris!
97 Elroy // Jun 24, 2009 at 10:22 pm
Thank God, @ 150$ a month , its too much for me to buy linkvoda
98 Derekp // Jun 24, 2009 at 10:23 pm
I think i’ve seen this somewhere before…but it’s not bad at all
99 Sandi // Jun 24, 2009 at 10:26 pm
Tell me more. Will it be free or will you be selling this? And if selling it, will you offer affiliate status to websites?
Thanks
100 SEO Deconstructed // Jun 24, 2009 at 10:42 pm
Is this just a wordpress exploit the various top commenter plugins? (Like linklove or top commentator) Some of these have options to turn on or off the nofollow anyway – but the validity of the nofollow tag still seems to be up for debate regardless so it’s good to get links regardless from related high authority sites, even if they do have the nofollow.
If it somehow speeds up / automates the process of finding and posting comments using our own customizable keyword & domain lists, then it’s definitely worth checking out…
cheers
Tav.
http://www.seodeconstructed.com
101 Trevor // Jun 24, 2009 at 11:04 pm
Chris,
I respect what you publish due to your unique perspectives on marketing angles, sales methods etc.
But after giving the whole loophole thing all I had (which was a lot), and not seeing any results after 4 months… I have come to realize that maybe I should just leave these “exploits” and “shortcuts” to be purchased by the “impatient newbie crowd” and continue building my online business using solid and proven principles and techniques.
After all, that is one of the concepts you speak about, “we all want the easy button when starting out, but this way of thinking is actually counterproductive to building the foundation of a real online business.” & “it’s ironic how many people just want to make money online and not build real assets.”
I don’t mean for it to seem like I am trying to get at you Chris, but what side do you really stand on…
Push Button Cash for Dummies or Long Term Asset Building?
-Trevor
102 Mitch // Jun 24, 2009 at 11:39 pm
You sure do have a bunch of excuses as to why so many failed with the MSN Loophole. If all the things you mention were necessary to make it work, why in the heck didn’t you mention it in the original sales letter?
103 Elle // Jun 24, 2009 at 11:39 pm
sounds interesting. thanks for sharing this..
104 admin // Jun 24, 2009 at 11:49 pm
Hi Trevor,
That’s a well stated question and one that definitely deserves an answer, for several reasons.
So here goes…
I 100% support, recommend and teach the notion that one should build their own assets, their own lists, own products, etc.
That is how it’s REALLY done.
Exploits, “loopholes” and otherwise tricks can be used to simply drive more volume to existing channels of YOUR business.
Whether that’s affiliate opt-in pages, your own stuff, etc.
That is the end goal, and that is what I teach and try to make clear in my courses, and in my joint-products (like MSN Loophole) .
We did stress the importance of SCALING UP once a good offer was discovered with more reliable methods – as well as, obviously, using these “tricks” to generate additional traffic flow into existing ports of entry for a person’s business.
In the case of this upcoming product, its sole purpose is to make it easier for REAL sites to gain links.
Not “POS” scraper sites or otherwise rehash content.
The “exploit” will not work for crappy sites, plain and simple.
But more importantly – aside from the confusion around MSN Loophole – the whole point of that product was to introduce an alternative TRAFFIC strategy.
NOT an “opportunity”.
Just traffic.
And traffic is only as good as what you send it to.
Which, of course, goes back to the #1 rule in online (or any) business – and that’s to build an asset, or assets, that provide value.
In retrospect, if I could go back in time I would have positioned MSN Loophole differently. It should have sold for more money to make it less available, and been targeted to the intermediate/advanced webmaster only.
You live and learn.
Thanks
-Chris
105 Chicken House Plans // Jun 25, 2009 at 12:00 am
Hi Chris,
I too am one of your faithful, and I was wondering if you have something extra for the VIP group.
Looking forward to the release.
106 Search Engine Optimisation Australia // Jun 25, 2009 at 12:03 am
Sounds like a great tool, as one who has had some good, ongoing success with the MSN loophole system, I’m looking forward to seeing how this works.
107 admin // Jun 25, 2009 at 12:07 am
@Mitch, I have ZERO “excuses”.
There are only 3 *reasons*, which I already mentioned above.
Yes, there is setup involved. And work.
But the difference is that it becomes an in-house link network that can be used for several sites, and in time the linking process is completely automatic.
That is an actual loophole, and rankings do happen consistently when that is built, as per our blueprint.
Just like how if you buy the “BowFlex” home gym or whatever, there is WORK involved.
Those that do it, get results
Those that do not – don’t.
That’s what it comes down to.
And that’s why there is an obvious mix of people who saw results, and those who did not.
-Chris
108 lazymanstraffic // Jun 25, 2009 at 12:48 am
Looks like I’m not the only one a bit frustrated at the lack of results with the MSN Loophole method.
However I blame myself more than the method. I think I gave up to early, as most of us do.
I’d suggest your new method should be just one of many methods we should each be using to build links, as nothing is the sole magic bullet it seems.
Bruce
109 admin // Jun 25, 2009 at 12:56 am
Bruce,
Exactly.
Nothing is the “be all” solution, other than:
1. Create valuable content
2. Promote profitable offers
Do that, and honestly you can pick your strategy.
Some are easier (article marketing, conduit method), and some take a bit of time to get going (loophole network, list-building/readership, etc.) – but “everything” works.
The whole point is to stick with what works best for YOU, and keep the overall strategy simple.
-Chris
110 Tanksalot // Jun 25, 2009 at 12:58 am
Sounds like a no brainer but think I will test on a struggling site first.
Tank
111 Martin // Jun 25, 2009 at 1:00 am
Hi Chris
Please put a link on your Blog Home Page to your ‘product links’ soI don’t have to puzzle over where to go to see what your selling.
Martin
112 LinkBackSeo // Jun 25, 2009 at 1:04 am
So when the gadget gets changed or dropped, the technique becomes obsolete?
It sounds like it could be very short term to me.
113 admin // Jun 25, 2009 at 1:09 am
@Martin – You’re absolutely right – I really need to do that sooner.
I’m actually “overhauling” everything in the background. TheLazyMarketer.com and ChrisRempel.com will be full-fledged content sites, with EASY navigation
I’ve done a lot of the initial content load, just finishing up the rest before I unveil the new, drastically needed face lift and site structure…
Thanks though!
Also – my products are at:
http://www.thelazymarketer.com/confessions/
and
http://www.thelazymarketer.com/vip.php
Cheers
@LinkBackSeo – the widget is individually hosted and managed on each individual site. The original creator(s) of the widget cannot modify the scripts remotely.
Cheers
-Chris
114 charles // Jun 25, 2009 at 1:15 am
I’ve just got a contract to build up PR++ links and have been wondering how to fulfill it. This look just the job.
I’ve got two performing sites which should do well.
And several crappy ones………
115 Michael // Jun 25, 2009 at 1:28 am
Are you serious?
116 truestar // Jun 25, 2009 at 1:29 am
Looks like another interesting tool from these guys…
I don’t understand why so many people are frustrated over MSN Loophole — I continue to have OUTSTANDING results from the program, and it only took about two months for strong rankings to be established.
Looking forward to adding this new program to my arsenal…
JT
117 Mikael Rieck // Jun 25, 2009 at 2:06 am
Chris, are we looking at a one time fee or a subscription base software?
118 admin // Jun 25, 2009 at 2:56 am
Hi Mikael,
I can’t reveal the pricing structure prior to launch, but what I will say is that it won’t be restrictive or high-ticket.
Cheers
-Chris
119 admin // Jun 25, 2009 at 3:00 am
Also, some people (including Nick, one of the first commenters) have been asking about whether this will work on Mac or not.
The answer from Dave is this:
It will work on a newer version of the Mac OS which “emulates” the windows environment.
Though it won’t be “officially” Mac-supported.
Thanks
-Chris
120 Knilles // Jun 25, 2009 at 3:16 am
Hi Chris,
will this software also work for non-English speaking markets?
It would be nice if it would work in Germany, France, Spain, the Netherlands etc. or is it limited to the US, UK, Canada and Australia?
121 Steve // Jun 25, 2009 at 4:07 am
Rock and Roll!
Cannot wait to get started.
122 Stone Mountain Handbags // Jun 25, 2009 at 4:08 am
This looks great, I’ve recently looked at other systems like BCD to get backlinks of high PR – do you know it?
del
123 Stone Mountain Handbags // Jun 25, 2009 at 4:21 am
Excellent – I needed abit of good news today… bring it on!
124 Francis // Jun 25, 2009 at 4:41 am
Hi Chris,
Thanks for your info, any clue on the catch?
Monthly subscriptions or outright purchase?
Which one?
Regards
125 admin // Jun 25, 2009 at 4:57 am
Hi Francis
I can’t disclose anything yet regarding price.
Sorry…
-Chris
126 Aquariums Bowls // Jun 25, 2009 at 5:00 am
Yes, Authority Loophole sounds good. Hope the price isn’t to high!
I purchased MSN Loophole but have not commenced using it because of the initial expense that is involved and then the on-going hosting fees. After reading the different comments on this blog it sounds like the program is very difficult with uncertain results.
I do not have a lot of SEO experience, so I would certainly struggle.
127 Knilles // Jun 25, 2009 at 5:13 am
Chris, would you take a look at my question, no. 120 ?
128 Daniel // Jun 25, 2009 at 6:09 am
Alright, what’s the catch? =P
129 Cyprus Apartment Rentals // Jun 25, 2009 at 6:30 am
Chris,
Any idea when the product will be released?
130 Oliver // Jun 25, 2009 at 8:47 am
Any ideas why Daves Loophole Site, http://www.walking-shoes.org is not even listed in BING anymore?
131 Arizona // Jun 25, 2009 at 8:58 am
Excited to see it when it is out.
132 Fast NJ // Jun 25, 2009 at 9:03 am
Anxious to see the pricing!
133 Doug // Jun 25, 2009 at 9:15 am
I also implemented the Loophole method with limited results at this point (6 months later).
But I figure I will be tweaking it, creating other money sites with longer-tail keywords, etc. for the next few years. If no results, then I may let it rest.
Why are we all so impatient?
Try opening a retail store (as I have done). You know, invest $50,000 (minimum) and then wait 5 years until you make a profit (if you’re lucky).
Loophole was $47 (I think). Do you expect magic?
Doug
134 Paul // Jun 25, 2009 at 10:00 am
Getting links from authority sites is exciting stuff for Internet Marketers and anyone else wanting to raise the profile of their website!
135 Val // Jun 25, 2009 at 11:22 am
Hi Chris,
Sounds good to me! Keep me posted!
136 Robert Alaney // Jun 25, 2009 at 1:56 pm
Interesting!
I feel like there is a scarcity of good marketing today. Good marketing means which can convert the leads into sales. The only marketing that has moved me in the last couple of years is Social Media Optimization.
137 Bill // Jun 25, 2009 at 2:12 pm
Interesting concept, but I share a lot of the same concerns as people commenting before me.This will be yet another “exploit” that loses luster once people adopt it.
In defense of Chris, though, I submit that his statement “everything works” is dead-on correct. Building an online business entails doing several things right, one of which is driving traffic.
When the web “smartens up,” only relevant links will matter. And “in text, in context” links will be the only ones that count for anything.
Content and solutions will always be king.
138 admin // Jun 25, 2009 at 2:25 pm
Hi Bill
One thing I will say is that this “exploit” still relies on quality sites (where the links point to), and quality “effort” is required to effectively activate the exploit.
Unlike MSN Loophole, Authority Loophole isn’t targeting a weakness with an algorithm.
Rather, it’s leveraging a very strong benefit that has been inadvertently constructed into a popular site function.
It’s pretty cool…
But getting back to the more important message: You are absolutely on target when you say that the STRATEGIES themselves are simply a detail.
The core indicator in your business (and income) is your central offer, persona, “funnel”, brand, etc.
The long and short of it is that if you want to build a lasting, long-term income (and make a great living), you need to actually be offering the market something of value.
Whether that’s content (as an affiliate), products, facilitating discussion/community, etc. or a mixture of some/all of those things – that’s what will outlast Google’s latest “update”.
You need to be building assets.
And tricks – like this one upcoming – are simply fuel for the fire.
When people recognize this, and structure their activities accordingly – they’ll see real progress.
That said, this is a hell of an easy way to secure some pretty awesome backlinks, for free.
For a good site – especially NEW sites – this will be very, very useful.
Cheers
-Chris
139 Garry // Jun 25, 2009 at 3:56 pm
Hay Chris, this sounds really good.
Count me in!
140 Luis // Jun 25, 2009 at 8:44 pm
please let me know when it comes out.
141 Trevor // Jun 25, 2009 at 11:18 pm
“In retrospect, if I could go back in time I would have positioned MSN Loophole differently. It should have sold for more money to make it less available, and been targeted to the intermediate/advanced webmaster only.
You live and learn.”
So, you are subtly implying that if the MSN Loophole did not work for someone, then it was primarily due to the fact that they are a beginner, and are not tech savvy enough to have made it work? Hmmmm….
Chris I’m not a beginner, so what’s the deal?
Where are the people having success with the MSN Loophole? Since nobody else can give some case studies maybe you can, I mean, it is your product…
I know for a fact that I’m not the only savvy online marketer who gave your program a try out of curiosity (primarily because I benefited from your previous releases) but then didn’t see anything from it…
-Trevor
142 admin // Jun 25, 2009 at 11:46 pm
Trevor,
No, I am implying that those with previous SEO experience are far more likely to succeed with a rather advanced SEO strategy.
And to answer your question about “where are the people who have succeeded” – they are right here on this blog.
In this post alone, 3 commenters report outstanding ongoing results, with another one saying that he did in fact achieve #1 rankings, which later faded – but this commenter also clearly admitted (and discovered) that his linkubaiter script was installed incorrectly.
One of the commenters even gives you the keywords he is ranking for – which are pretty impressive.
Look again.
It’s right in front of you.
IF the MSN Loophole was a “scam” – do you think someone like me (who has a lot to lose by standing behind a scam) would risk his reputation not only promoting it…
…but also defending it?
Quit reading between the lines, and look at what I am ACTUALLY saying.
I am implying what I’m ACTUALLY saying, to the letter.
Yes, if I could rewind time, I would aim the product at a more experienced webmaster.
The “living and learning” comment meant that:
1) Like ANY endeavor, you encounter issues AFTER THE FACT that you did not previously anticipate.
That’s called “being human”. Get used to it – it will happen when YOU launch products as well, versus accusing from the safe sidelines.
Especially ones with a big claim.
2) Organic rankings are NOT under your control. Even the best SEO’s have their sites bounce. Disappear. Usually they reappear. Sometimes they don’t.
Rankings fluctuate. They take TIME.
The whole point of the MSN Loophole is that you build a self-contained, automated linking system that, when it’s established enough (and your blogs do need to be indexed effectively), then in time – your SEO efforts for MSN become largely hands-off.
And the rankings achievable using this method (PROPERLY) speak for themselves.
See comment #88 on this post for examples of such keywords.
It works for us and many others.
It was working for us – and others – for years prior to the launch.
It will NOT work if your blogs are not well indexed.
It will NOT work if your domains don’t match your target keyword well.
It will NOT work if you don’t have enough blogs (see blueprint for ideal ratios)
It will NOT work if you don’t wait for MULTIPLE index updates. That is how the link-rotation trick goes into effect.
Which is why if your blogs are not well indexed (the part where the initial WORKload comes into play), then I don’t care if you’re waiting for 7 days or 7 months – it will NOT work.
These things are clearly mentioned in the blueprint.
And the 20+ followup videos/additions we did for the purpose of clarity and delivering value.
Those are the facts, and you can do with them what you will.
Obviously, it is not a traffic strategy that suits some people.
-Chris
143 James Stein // Jun 26, 2009 at 2:10 am
Sounds very cool and will wait around to learn more and see the release. As someone that builds backlinks using social bookmarking and articles this should prove to be interesting indeed..
144 Cj // Jun 26, 2009 at 2:16 am
Can’t wait to learn more about the release. Love your tweets.
145 Domains at Retail // Jun 26, 2009 at 8:27 am
I was skeptical about loophole after I found out most of my sites were not ranking. Then I did get two pretty popular terms get to #2 and #4 spots on MSN out of like 66 million competition. Those sites did fall off though after and have not recovered (those same sites used to have the privacy policy page indexed as well, which now are not :S).
In the mean time two other money sites have been ranked pretty well. One at #2 of 28.6 million competition and the other and one at #15 of 15.6 million results.
The only thing I havent got is consistency, and I have found that my blogs on MSN had 100′s of pages indexed then drop down to only the main page showing up when you do the site: check on MSN. Haven’t changed nothing, just happened one day. Don’t really understand that? But I am actually going to try and get some good links to my blogs and see if that makes them authoritative to get the trick to work better.
I do believe it works, just not as good as I’d like it to work right now. But again the money I have made from the few sites that have gotten recognition has covered my costs of hosting and the loophole report and a bit more, so I didn’t lose on it.
146 HappyToRecommend // Jun 26, 2009 at 11:18 am
Sound like something I’d me more than happy to recommend!
147 James Schramko // Jun 26, 2009 at 11:45 am
Is this the Squidoo link adding exploit?
148 admin // Jun 26, 2009 at 11:52 am
@Domains at Retail – You said:
“But I am actually going to try and get some good links to my blogs and see if that makes them authoritative to get the trick to work better.”
That’s exactly why your blogs fluctuate from being indexed, non-indexed, etc. This would obviously effect your moneysite rankings directly as well.
Your blogs NEED to be well indexed. RSS and pinging is JUST the initial tasking. The whole point is to build an established blog network.
Linkubaiter is pointless if it’s hosted on pages that aren’t being spidered.
@James – Nope
149 Adrian // Jun 26, 2009 at 12:52 pm
@Trevor
I did $2500 a month on one keyword before I found out my blog network was in poor shape.. currently working on that again so I can gain that back.
Less whining – more doing
150 admin // Jun 26, 2009 at 3:11 pm
@Oliver (comment #130)
You must be viewing Bing outside of North America
Because on both Canadian and US IP addresses, it’s on the first page of results for “walking shoes”.
Anyone else?
-Chris
151 Adrian // Jun 26, 2009 at 3:36 pm
The walking shoes site is #6 for me.
152 Adrian // Jun 26, 2009 at 3:36 pm
As a side note for everyone – the new version of Cafeinated content is awful.. stick with v.335.
New version doesn’t even get content.
153 Dexx // Jun 26, 2009 at 8:47 pm
Hey All,
Just wanted to come back and give a quick update, I’m currently testing out the software prior to launch and I must say…I’m impressed.
Now here’s some things that people should know (which might help with the bickering and negativity in here)
1) This software makes this strategy FASTER to do, however it can be (and probably IS BEING) done. So for those who are claiming to doubtful of Chris and Dave’s abilities…feel free to not use it….but it’d be the equivalent of running to work vs driving a sports car.
2) I have located AND verified that I have been able to obtain a PR7 LINK with this software in the first 3 hours of using it…as I said…I’m absolutely floored, and when I viewed some of the sites being linked to from the main page they are all PR6…so I have a good feeling on where my site will be heading with this strategy.
3) I dont really care whether you do or dont use this software…why? Because it means less competition for me.
So there’s my initial feedback, I’m in the process of developing a full blown review with video walkthrough for the launch.
Sure you could claim I’m biased because I’m already using the software, but like I said, your thoughts on the software (or me) will not affect the fact that this thing does work and will get results. (no domains to buy or scripts to install)
~Dexx
154 Twitted by GoAskChris // Jun 26, 2009 at 9:33 pm
[...] This post was Twitted by GoAskChris [...]
155 Cheap Summer Dresses // Jun 27, 2009 at 10:18 am
approximately when you think it will be released for sale?
156 Rene G // Jun 27, 2009 at 11:55 am
Can’t wait for this to come out. Anything to make link building quicker. Thanks Chris
157 admin // Jun 27, 2009 at 1:54 pm
@ Summer Dresses (is that your real name?)
It was scheduled to go live on the 29th or 30th of June, but we’ve tentatively pushed it back until after the July 4th mayhem…
We could either launch it sloppy sooner, with few support resources in place to be added later – or we could launch it right the first time, which is what we prefer.
It’s a win/win situation for everyone – us, customers, affiliates, etc. – when a product isn’t launched prematurely…
So it will realistically get released probably around July 8th.
It WILL be worth the wait.
Cheers
-Chris
158 Greg Gillespie // Jun 27, 2009 at 6:03 pm
Hey Chris,
Thanks for pointing that out to @Trevor, about my page one position 2 for “best weight loss pills”, there I have said it again.
Yes it took longer but I got it there and YES I am now building my site and business to provide a quality solution for someone interested in that line of products.
I feel sorry for Trevor that he gave up too soon. It was Dave Kelly with his great support and fast answers to my emails that told me to “hang in there” and so I did. Not 4 months, but 6 months and it worked.
I have many other products planned to take advantage, and now I know the timeframes.
Just test me on this one and do “Bing” (US )search and see how many people have gotten to the top of the first page for hundreds of keywords and probably don’t know it.
Many clicks take you to the “Page not found” error as the guy has ditched his page, go and click the cache link and see what it looked like.
Yep that’t right just as the starter template dictated and but now it is gone and the opportunity and hard work have been lost.
There’s that nasty word again WORK, nobody wants to do work, they just want results. I guess it is somewhat ironic on blog by this name but when the WoRk is done, then you can be lazy.
Chris, any ETA on the launch?
Cheers,
Greg
Oh yeah the waves were pumping in Narrabeen this week, I know off topic again, but this is what I like to do with my lazy time.
G.
159 Adrian // Jun 27, 2009 at 10:13 pm
Beta testers? Any more room? =)
160 Adrian // Jun 28, 2009 at 1:39 pm
@ Greg – What is the URL? Feel free to email me. I don’t see that ranking.. may be a MSN datacenter issue..
161 Doug // Jun 28, 2009 at 9:29 pm
Yes, that sounds awesome! But how does it work, what does it cost? btw, does anybody know if you can build backlinks using Twitter?
162 Firepow 2.0 // Jun 28, 2009 at 9:37 pm
Count me in……do we know if there will be a monthly subscription payment or will it be a one time fee?
163 Oliver // Jun 29, 2009 at 12:52 pm
It looks like walking-shoes.org is #10 on Bing now.
That makes me feel better about the thousands I invested in my blog network
Now just to be patient.
BTW- I am in the states.
164 A White Hat ?Hack? for Systematically Getting Links From 1000?s of Authority Sites? // Jun 30, 2009 at 6:07 am
[...] (disaster) from Dave Kelly. Here is the link to the Dave Kelly blog for further information: A White Hat “Hack” for Systematically Getting Links From 1000’s of Authority Sites… [...]
165 Maia // Jun 30, 2009 at 9:44 pm
This will be a one time fee or monthly fee? Please very economical :$
166 Johnny // Jul 1, 2009 at 8:34 pm
Any discounts for Linkvana members?
167 Knilles // Jul 2, 2009 at 2:54 am
Hello Admin,
will this software also work for non-English speaking markets?
It would be nice if it would work in Germany, France, Spain, the Netherlands etc. or is it limited to the US, UK, Canada and Australia?
168 William // Jul 7, 2009 at 9:28 am
Okay, I saw an email from you expecting to see at least the release date but no such luck
I think it’s all great stuff and worth waiting for but I think you should stop teasing by sending torture & anxiety building emails.
Release the app already – pleeeeeease!
169 breaking up // Jul 7, 2009 at 9:36 am
Wait for it come to the public
170 Big Mike St. Louis // Jul 7, 2009 at 10:12 am
Hey man this backlink stuff is too kool.
Iam waiting for the new software IM IN!! Anybody thats sittng on the fence move forward before your niche gurus beat you to this new software im sure this will do the trick.
171 Andrew // Jul 7, 2009 at 10:18 am
Total Novice! I’ve setup two networks of ten splash sites with one set of ten blog sites across 10 c class. Yahoo is ranking 60% on page one, Google is ranking 35% on page one and MSN, well… nowhere. One site after two months appeared in #1 place then one week later it disappeared.
I’ve not done anything since setting up the networks other than check rankings.
Rankings are generally stable, however the odd few move down and up 200 – 300 positions sometimes.
So to conclude, something is working well and I’m sure if I kept building then it could only get better. Not sure what to do with MSN though…
172 sydneyaccountant // Jul 7, 2009 at 10:18 am
Been waiting and waiting eager to see whats in store and cost. Hopefully it lives up to its reputation.
173 James // Jul 7, 2009 at 11:06 am
I look forward to it.
James
174 Massage Marketing Ideas // Jul 7, 2009 at 11:34 am
Hey Chris, I definitely like the idea of your new product. I think it’s going to be a winner and can’t wait to use it on my own sites.
175 Nadia // Jul 7, 2009 at 1:30 pm
I really hope it’s not based on the trackback link theory — because that would be old news. I doubt it since that isn’t really an exploit and many people have been doing for years. Oh well, look forward to tomorrow. =)
176 darryll // Jul 8, 2009 at 7:35 am
thats cool man.. keep me posted
177 Sharon Deloy // Jul 8, 2009 at 11:05 am
It sounds really great, Chris. I also bought the original Conduit Method. I hope this works just as well.
As far as waiting for results: sometimes Google does things right away, sometimes it takes weeks.
Who Knows? Only Google Knows.
178 FAP Turbo Evolution // Jul 9, 2009 at 10:05 am
this is going to be a huge asset and if it is automated will save tons of time. Really looking forward to this little “hack”
179 Jedi Wealth // Jul 9, 2009 at 11:04 am
Dave says you are a co-developer of the software..so why don’t you let us take a look?
It sounds awesome!
180 ben m // Jul 9, 2009 at 2:28 pm
looks good, looking forward to seeing it
181 swancky // Jul 10, 2009 at 3:10 pm
If everybody becomes an “AUTHORITY” in everything, who is gonna listen?
Maybe the marketing ploy used here may be flawed because I am for progress of the masses but at least let it be for goals worth fighting for.
(I guess I got everybody going for that didn’t I? LOL)
182 Protaras Apartment Rentals // Jul 11, 2009 at 3:55 am
Did I miss something or has the release date been and gone now?
183 Get Rid of Warts // Jul 11, 2009 at 11:21 pm
The release date is coming very soon – 14th July.
Be ready if you want to buy this.
Good luck.
184 David Higginson // Jul 19, 2009 at 9:42 am
Sounds Awesome.
Thanks
185 Marty // Sep 20, 2009 at 8:06 am
Can’t wait!
186 Marty // Sep 20, 2009 at 8:06 am
oh it’s already happened… that embarrassing
187 Los Angeles Personal Injury Lawyer // Dec 28, 2009 at 3:51 pm
This looks awesome but does it really work, I would love to be able to move my site about Los Angeles Personal Injury Lawyer up, and be able to handle more cases.
188 development finance // Feb 1, 2010 at 7:23 pm
Hi our seo company currently use this and find it very useful. Although there is no pr 5 sites so far linking to our development finance site.
Leave a Comment