 |
------------------------------------------------------------------- Hey there - Chris Rempel here from TheLazyMarketer.com... Maybe you've heard of me - maybe you haven't. You don't care - but you DO care about the truth when it comes to getting free traffic from possibly the most valuable site in the world for anyone in internet business - Google.com So that's what I'll deliver - right now. The truth. No hype, no bullcrap. Here goes... Google is a Big, Dumb Robot Or no - wait - I must be wrong... They actually employ half the world's population to make sure that every site in their index is playing by the "white hat" rules. That's right, 3.5 billion employees is probably what it would take to ensure the correct placement of each listed page of content in Google's massive "internet indexing" engine - thoroughly analyzing each page to make sure that its users will be finding the best content possible... Obviously - I'm proving a point with sarcasm. Google is algorythm-based, and always will be. It's not a directory. It relies on OUR content, OUR links and OUR text to determine rankings, along with perhaps some "user feedback" data based on bounced visitors from organic listings. But beyond that - there is no magic formula, at all. Yes, Google bans domains and penalizes sites for a few reasons (usually copyright infringements, distributing illegal stuff, etc.), as well as an obvious track-record of buying links solely for rankings. But beyond that, it's just a system that you can work with to generate as much traffic as you want. It simply depends on how many sites you feel like building, indexing, and building a search presence for. Read those last two lines again... That's the truth. Now - Let's Dispel Those Myths I Mentioned At The Top Of The Page:
This is the biggest lie of all - and one that I also believed for a long time, until recently... Think about this for a second - do you REALLY think that when users appreciate a site and link to it - that all of their sites are going to be "related" to the topic? Let's say some guy with a small hotel in Switzerland buys a bunch of specialty wireless internet equipment from a wireless company of some kind. And so he links to their site from his - out of appreciation, and perhaps to also show the type of quality services he's invested in for potential guests. That's exactly the kind of "activity" that Google is counting on - that's a perfect example of a natural, unsolicited "link vote" if I've ever seen one. And it comes from a TOTALLY unrelated site. But let's not just rely on "theory" to prove this. Instead - I'll give you a real life example - one of my first sites, about skateboards. When I first launched the website, I, like every other webmaster in the world, looked for ways to get my site listed into Google. I stumbled across a tutorial somewhere that said I should submit my site to a bunch of directories. So I spent a good day or two doing that. And for some reason, my site got featured in a nautical directory for BOATS. I have no idea why. Anyway, this listing somehow got syndicated into a whole "boating network", and in a few weeks (literally), my skateboard site was getting top-rankings in the skateboarding niche on Google. The last time I checked, boats and skateboards are just a tad unrelated. Now, I'm not saying that relevant links aren't good, or valuable. They're great! It's just that they're not a requirement for ranking well in the search engines. Not solely, anyway, as eventually you'll get "relevant" links naturally as your sites grow in popularity. (Try proving me wrong - look up any major site with Yahoo's "site explorer" and you'll see a variety of inlinks from every kind of site imaginable, including some relevant ones.) Alright - on to the next myth...
As much as all those New York SEO agencies would like for you to believe this - it's false. Search engine ranking algorythms - the reason why sites are ranked the way they are - are simple! Every major search engine - including Google - uses the following primary factors to determine how a site will rank in their indexes: >> Site Content (Text, Title Tags, Headers, Meta Descriptions, etc) >> Onsite Navigation (Linking Structures, SiteMap, Easy "Spider Access" to All Pages, etc) >> OFF-Site Factors (Inlinks, "Weight" of Inlinks, Context of Links - and Anchor Text, Linking Patterns, etc) Let me just simplify all of this by saying that if you have a simple site (or blog) with text content that follows the most basic "on-site" optimization guidelines, and then get other sites to link to yours by way of submitting articles, getting exposure naturally and just by "spreading the word" in general - in time, you'll be visible on the search engines to some capacity. Obviously, if you know the specifics of the game - what keywords to target, how to build tons of links quickly - yet naturally - you can tap into the Google traffic stream effectively & quite quickly - making a fortune. Just keep in mind that there's millions of websites out there with amazing rankings, whose owners are academics, professionals or otherwise people who don't know the first thing about SEO, and many of them have no intention (or inkling) about making a profit from their traffic. And if they can get thousands of visitors - maybe millions - from Google for free, so can you. It ain't rocket science: Build Content, Get Links Do those two things, and the big dumb robot will send your site tons of traffic (soon enough), as well. If you need to learn the specifics of SEO, including on-site and off-site optimization, at the bottom of this page I link to a great, 100-page free report on the topic. But for now, let's move on to the next myth...
BZZZZ!!! Wrong! Take a look at Answers.com for a moment. When you're done, check out EzineArticles.com. After that, go to Google and type in "submit your article" and check out how many sites have high pageranks that are comprised almost exclusively of duplicate content. That's right, folks - the big bad "DC" penalty is a complete hoax. It won't get you banned at all - unless you're doing blackhat stuff like scraping, cloaking on top of dupe content, and so on - but that's a whole other ball game, and one that I don't really bother with. (I do mighty well enough with white-hat stuff, and I'd rather have networks of value that I can SELL later on if need be.) But using reprintable articles, or PLR articles or whatever "as is" isn't going to harm your rankings at all. Use reprintable content as a PART of your overall content strategy for maximum effect, to increase long-tail search engine traffic. Why not? It's free, extra traffic... Alright - let's blot out this next myth...
Everyone is screaming the "death" of ranking power for reciprocal links. They're wrong. Reciprocal links don't seem to be as powerful as one-ways, but they DO have an effect on your Google rankings, and they can significantly impact your rankings on MSN & Yahoo - which you'd be insane to overlook as an organic traffic source. But you won't believe me unless I show you an example (and rightly so), so here you go: I'd say that one of the more competitive keyphrases out there is "internet marketing" - wouldn't you agree? Did you know that right now (as I write this, it's Dec. 20th, 2007), the top-ranking site in Google for the term "internet marketing" is www.FreeInternetMarketingCourses.com, a site by Cody Moya.
It currently ranks number one for a phrase with 63.4 Million competing sites, and that's with the keyword in "quotes". And guess what? The site uses a widely-criticized reciprocal linking network to build its literally thousands upon thousands of reciprocal links. Check out the site and see for yourself. Hmmmm.... Perhaps not as "useless" or "damaging" as you might of thought. In my own experience, one-way links are stronger and have a better bang for your buck (and time), but reciprocal links definitely aren't worthless. Moving On...
I can't exactly prove this myth "wrong", because adding frequent content is a good thing for your visitors, and it will result in more traffic, both from repeat visitors returning to see what's new, as well as more long-tail traffic due to the simple fact that Google has more content to index from your domain. Also, with the way that blogs often get "pinged" and indexed into feed syndication networks with each new post, keeping a blog "fresh" also simultaneously contributes to more backlinks - which might seem like a solid basis for the myth. However, I can't prove this myth "right", either. Reason #1: I have a site in a niche that still maintains it's top ranking for a key phrase with 300,000 competitors, and has done so for more than 3 years now. And the last time I updated it was 16 months ago, when I decided to change a background color on one of my tables. Not exactly "keeping it fresh"... It's the INBOUND LINKS that hold the ranking. Reason #2: Think about sites like HomeStarRunner.com (a popular humor/animation site), which ranks #1 out of 2.16 Million competing sites for the keyword "Homestar". The site has basically no text content - it's all flash - and so any updates done to the site are basically useless from an SEO point of view. Again - it's the thousands of backlinks pointing to the domain that hold the rankings. You can literally have a stale, old-as-hell site that hasn't been updated in YEARS that still rakes in a boatloads of traffic from the Big, Dumb Robot. I do :-) So can you. And Finally...
No, it's really not. It's very, very easy once you know the basics of keyword targeting (and what to target), onsite optimization and choosing a niche. Really - all you have to do is build content sites (or blogs) around profitable topics, promoting products that have proven themselves to sell and targeting buyer-profile keywords, which are usually much less competitive than the "top keywords" in the niche. The only part of SEO that takes any real effort is getting backlinks - especially one-way links from "authority" sites. As of right now, LINKS - and what those links "say" (the anchor text), is what will turn unleash Google's traffic stream for your site. Onsite factors have some bearing on your rankings, but it's your backlinks that determine the authority of your site, and your site's content. In fact, I can sum up virtually the entirety of organic, search engine marketing like this: A Large Variety of Inbound Links = Free Google Traffic It's that simple. The only problem is - how do you get enough backlinks, from quality sites (with some "authority") to make your site rank well for your target keywords? Well, you can do it the hard way - begging other sites to link to you - or, you can do it the smart way. In fact, there's 25 smart (and fast) ways to get one-way links that I've explained in full detail in a powerful, to-the-point report that you can start reading in a matter of moments... Introducing:
Here's Just a Few of the 25 SMART Linking Strategies:
That's just a handful of examples of what's inside - and what's more, practically all of my top 25 one-way-linking methods can be done yourself, for free. Alright, let's get straight to the point: How Much? It's a massive $9.00 That's about how much money my couch has at any given time. If you understand how much backlinks are worth in the long run (and the short-run!) for your affiliate sites, product sites and content sites, then gaining some new & immediatley actionable insights into drastically accellerating the linking process is worth a hell of a lot more than that...
Okay, you've been on this page long enough. It's action time. For nine whole big ones, you get 25 of my most effective & leveraged link-building strategies that will elevate your rankings and secure floods of traffic (for years) if you put them into action with any kind of consistency. Or, you can leave, and not get them. Your choice: [BUY NOW BUTTON] Very
Important: After the payment is completed, be sure to press
the button labeled "return to merchant", or else you'll
have to wait for me to email it over, which isn't much fun for either
of us :-) I'll see you on the other side... --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- That Free SEO Ebook I told you about above... ______________________________________________________________________________________________ |
|
TheLazyMarketer.com - Copyright © 2007 All Rights Reserved ClickBank is a registered trademark of Keynetics Inc., a Delaware corporation. TheLazyMarketer.com is not affiliated with Keynetics Inc. in any way, nor does Keynetics Inc. sponsor or approve any TheLazyMarketer.com product. Keynetics Inc. expresses no opinion as to the correctness of any of the statements made by TheLazyMarketer.com in the materials on this Web page |